Use of Technology Acceptance Model for Turnitin®

Dr. Abu Turab Alam


A useful Information System is difficult to conceive and develop. Research on technology has revealed that end-user likes or dislikes may matter towards the success or failure of information system (IS). A highly complicated system in which developers have put lots of development efforts may fail if the end-user dislikes it after its initial installation. In software engineering literature it is claimed that system rejection is mostly caused by not meeting the non-functional requirements. In this paper, a study is being done on ‘turnitin®’ as technology and its acceptance to a group of students in order to find out confirmation of result as claimed by TAM while it is a post implementation research activity for technology acceptance.

Full Text:



Aczel, 1999, Complete Business Statistics, 4th ed., Richard D. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA.

Badges and Scott, 2009, LiteratureReview, Independently Published, Studies on ‘turnitin®’ Services, Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, Vol 14, No 20

Batane, 2010, LiteratureReview, Independently Published, Studies on ‘turnitin®’ Services

Cheah and Bretag, 2008, LiteratureReview, Independently Published, Studies on ‘turnitin®’ Services

Christine DiStefano, Min Zhu, Diana Mîndrilă, 2009, Understanding and Using Factor Scores: Considerations for the Applied Researcher,

Davis, 1989, Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly, September,.319-340.

Davis, FD.,&Ann Arbor, 1989, User acceptance of computer Technology: a comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science, Vol. 35 No. 8, 982-1003.

Davis, FD., 1993, User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 38, 475-487.

Davis and Carroll, 2009, LiteratureReview, Independently Published, Studies on ‘turnitin®’ Services


Hair et al., 1998, Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C. (1998), Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Igbaria et al., 1995, Igbaria, M., Iivari, J. and Maragahh, H. (1995), Why do individuals use computer technology? A Finnish case study, Information & Management, Vol. 29, 227-238.

Nummenmaa et al., 1996, Nummenmaa, T., Konttinen, R., Kuusinen, J. and Leskinen, E. (1996), TutkimusaineistonAnalyysi (Analysis of Research Data), WSOY, Helsinki



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Chief Editor

Prof. Dr. Tariq Rahim Soomro 
College of Computer Science & Information Systems


Dr. Muhammad Mansoor Alam
 Professor and Associate Dean
 College of Computer Science & Information Systems

Associate Editors

Engr. Syed Mubashir Ali
Senior Lecturer & Course Coordinator
College of Computer Science & Information Systems

Publication Coordinator
Humaira Kanwal

Editorial Advisory Board (Internal)

Dr. Syed Irfan Hyder
Dr. S.M. Aqil Burney
Dr. Ejaz Ahmed
Dr. Mohammad Irshad Khan
Dr. Shahid Amjad
Dr. Fatima Riaz
Dr. Insia Hussain
Dr. Dr. Ehsan Rehman
Dr. Imran Majid
Dr. Khurram Iqbal
Dr. Zeeshan Shahid
Dr. Seema Ansari
Dr. Sumaira Khan


Editorial Advisory Board (International)

Prof. Dr. Mazliham Mohd Su'ud, President, Universiti Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Prof. Dr. Ghassan Al-Qaimari, President, Emirates College of Technology, Abu Dhabi, UAE
Prof. Dr. Patrice Boursier, Universite de La Rochelle, La Rochelle, France
Prof. Dr. Mudassir Uddin, Professor, University of Karachi, Pakistan
Dr. Nadeem Doudpota, Associate Professor, Al-Baha University, KSA
Dr. Haithem Abdelrazaq Almefleh, Associate Professor, Yarmouk University, Yarmouk, Jordan
Dr. Saiful Islam Ansari, Assistant Professor, University of Tabuk, Saudi Arabia