Erum qureshi, Saquib Yusuf Janjua, Shahab Alam Malik


Research evidences show that proactive personality and high quality Leader-Member relationship helps to develop ingenuity at work. However, this direct relationship doest not sustain empirical support in certain condition for different reasons. This research aims to find out the moderating role of task identity in relationship between proactive personality, leader member exchange and ingenious work involvement of NGO employees. The research focuses that the antecedents of ingenious work involvement are strongly related to it when employees have task identity. Cross sectional study conducted in NGO sector revealed a positive relation between antecedents under study and ingenious work involvement and it also confirmed the moderating role of task identity. The study points out the importance of proactive personality, leader member exchange and job design issues for increasing employee’s creativity at work. 


Proactive personality, Task Identity, Ingenious Work Involvement, Leader-Member Relationship

Full Text:



Amabile, T. M. (2001). Beyond talent: John Irving and the passionate craft of creativity. American Psychologist, 56(4), 333-336.

Atwater, L., & Carmeli, A. (2009). Leader–member exchange, feelings of energy, and involvement in creative work. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 264-275.

Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J. (2007). The influence of leaders' and other referents' normative expectations on individual involvement in creative work. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(1), 35-48.

Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of management, 26(3), 435-462.

Crant, J. M., & Bateman, T. S. (2000). Charismatic leadership viewed from above: The impact of proactive personality. Journal of organizational Behavior,21(1), 63-75.

Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of organizational behavior, 14(2), 103-118.

Dolisca, F., Carter, D. R., McDaniel, J. M., Shannon, D. A., & Jolly, C. M. (2006). Factors influencing farmers’ participation in forestry management programs: A case study from Haiti. Forest ecology and management, 236(2), 324-331.

Eder, P., & Sawyer, J. E. (2007, April). A meta-analytic examination of employee creativity. In 22nd annual conference, society of industrial and organizational psychology (SIOP), New York, NY, April.

Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation.Journal of applied psychology, 75(1), 51-59.

Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L., & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of applied psychology, 87(3), 565-573.

Ford, C. M. (2002). The futurity of decisions as a facilitator of organizational creativity and change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15(6), 635-646.

Ghaus-Pasha, A., Jamal, H., & Iqbal, M. A. (2002). Dimensions of the nonprofit sector in Pakistan. Social Policy and Development center.

Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The leadership quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.

Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative description of personality: the big-five factor structure. Journal of personality and social psychology, 59(6), 1216-1229.

Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational behavior and human performance, 16(2), 250-279.

Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 90-105.

Hofstede, G. (2006). What did GLOBE really measure? Researchers’ minds versus respondents’ minds. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 882-896.

Humphrey, S. E., Morgeson, F. P., & Mannor, M. J. (2009). Developing a theory of the strategic core of teams: a role composition model of team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 48-61.

Langfred, C. W., & Moye, N. A. (2004). Effects of task autonomy on performance: an extended model considering motivational, informational, and structural mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 934-945.

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American psychologist, 57(9), 705-717.

Lunenburg, F. C. (2011). Self-efficacy in the workplace: Implications for motivation and performance. International journal of management, business, and administration, 14(1), 1-6.

McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five‐factor model and its applications. Journal of personality, 60(2), 175-215.

Ohly, S., Sonnentag, S., & Pluntke, F. (2006). Routinization, work characteristics and their relationships with creative and proactive behaviors. Journal of organizational behavior, 27(3), 257-279.

Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of management journal, 39(3), 607-634.

Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of applied psychology, 91(3), 636-652.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879-903.

Poon, J. M., 2004. Career commitment and career success: moderating role of emotion perception. Career Development International, 94(4), 374-390.

Rank, J., Pace, V. L., & Frese, M. (2004). Three avenues for future research on creativity, innovation, and initiative. APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 53(4), 518-528.

Raza, S. A., & Naqvi, S. A. (2011). Quality of Pakistani university graduates as perceived by employers: Implications for faculty development. Journal of Quality and Technology

Management, 7(1), 57 ‐ 72.

Roberts, S. M., Jones Iii, J. P., & Fröhling, O. (2005). NGOs and the globalization of managerialism: A research framework. World Development, 33(11), 1845-1864.

Settoon, R. P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R. C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader–member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of applied psychology, 81(3), 219-227.

Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly,15(1), 33-53.

Sims, H. P., Szilagyi, A. D., & Keller, R. T. (1976). The measurement of job characteristics. Academy of Management journal, 19(2), 195-212.

Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: a new look at the interface between nonwork and work. Journal of Applied Psychology,88(3), 518-528.

Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 277-293.

Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships.Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 591-620.

Unsworth, K. L., & Parker, S. K. (2003). Proactivity and innovation: Promoting a new workforce for the new workplace. The new workplace: A guide to the human impact of modern working practices, 175-196.

Van Dyne, L., Jehn, K. A., & Cummings, A. (2002). Differential effects of strain on two forms of work performance: individual employee sales and creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(1), 57-74.

Volmer, J., Spurk, D., & Niessen, C. (2012). Leader–member exchange (LMX), job autonomy, and creative work involvement. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 456-465.

Youngcourt, S. S., Leiva, P. I., & Jones, R. G. (2007). Perceived purposes of performance appraisal: Correlates of individual‐and position‐focused purposes on attitudinal outcomes. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 18(3), 315-343.

Yousaf, A., Sanders, K., & Shipton, H. (2013). Proactive and politically skilled professionals: What is the relationship with affective occupational commitment? Asian Pac J Manag, 30 (1), 211-230.

Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). The influence of creative process engagement on employee creative performance and overall job performance: a curvilinear assessment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 862-873.

Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2003). Awakening employee creativity: The role of leader emotional intelligence. The leadership quarterly, 14(4), 545-568.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.