Sarwat Sultan, Farasat Kanwal, Shahzad Gul


Keeping the view of existence of gender inequity in workplace that disregards the rationale of equal dealing with all workers, the present study explored the contribution of factors associated with individual and organizations in construction of perception of gender inequity among teachers. A sample of 341 college teachers provided data on Perceived Gender Inequity Scale and filled the information sheet for individual and organizational-level predictors. Results reveal that college teachers perceived gender inequity in their colleges and female teachers perceived higher gender inequity privileging males as compared to be male teachers we find organizational-level variables as a group highly predictive for perceived gender inequity than individual predictors. Individual predictors as one group explicated smaller variance, with gender, age, education, and marital status (except for job status and job experience) yielding a substantial impact in the predicted direction.


Gender inequity, job segregation, perception of fairness, distribution of rewards.

Full Text:




Bielby, W. T., & Baron, J. N. (1984). A Woman’s Place is With Other Women: Sex Segregation Within Organizations, in B. F. Reskin (ed.), Sex Segregation in the Workplace (National Academy Press, Washington, DC), pp. 27–55.

Blau, F. D., Ferber, M. A., & Winkler, A. (1998). The Economics of Women, Men, and Work, 3rd edition, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.

Blum, T. C., Fields, D. L., & Goodman, J. S. (1994). Organization-level Determinants of Women in Management, Academy of Management Journal 37(2), 241–268.

Britton, D. M., & Williams, C. L., (2000). Response to Baxter and Wright, Gender and Society, 14(6), 804–808.

Channar, Z. A. (2010). Gender discrimination in workforce through sticky floor & glass ceiling Effects: a study of public & private Organizations of Pakistan. (Doctoral dissertation).Isra University, Hyderabad. Retrieved from http://eprints.hec.gov.pk/7020.

Channar, Z. A., Abbasi, Z., & Ujan, I, A. (2011). Gender Discrimination in Workforce and its Impact on the Employees. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 5 (1), 177-191.

Ely, R. F., (1995). The Power in Demography: Women’s Social Constructions of Gender Identity at Work, Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 589–634.

Faisal, F. (2010). Measuring perceptions of work Environment among educated Female public servants in Pakistan. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 48(1), 135-165.

Gutek, B. A., Cohen, A. G., & Tsui, A. (1996). Reactions to Perceived Discrimination, Human Relations, 49(6), 791–813.

Gutek, B. A., & Morasch, B. (1982). Sex-ratios, Sex role Spill over, and Sexual Harassment of Women at Work, Journal of Social Issues, 38, 55–74.

Ibarra, H., & Andrews, S. B. (1993). Power, Social influence, and Sense Making: Effects of Network Centrality and Proximity on Employee Perceptions, Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(2), 277–303.

Kanter, R. M., (1977). Men and Women of the Corporation, Basic Books, New York.

McEwan, T., (2001). Managing Values and Beliefs in Organizations, Financial Times/Prentice Hall, New York.

Mueller, C. W., & Wallace, J. E. (1996). Justice and the Paradox of the Contented Female Worker, Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(4), 338-349.

Meyerson, D. E., & Fletcher, J. K. (2000). A Modest Manifesto for Shattering the Glass Ceiling, Harvard Business Review, 78(l), 127–136.

Ngo, H. Y., (1997). Women and Employment in Asian Newly-industrialized Countries, International Journal of Employment Studies, 5(1), 67–93.

Ngo, H. Y., (2001). Perceptions of Gender Inequity at Work in Hong Kong, Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 7(1), 111–132.

Ngo, H. Y., Foley, S., Wong, A., & Loi, R. (2013). Who Gets More of the Pie? Predictors of Perceived Gender Inequity at Work. Journal of Business Ethics 45: 227–241.

Pazy, A. (1986). Persistence of Pro-male Bias Despite Identical Information Regarding Causes of Success. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 38, 366–377.

Phelan, J., (1994). The Paradox of the Contented Female Worker: An Assessment of Alternative Explanations, Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(2), 95–107.

Reskin, B. F., (2000). Bringing the Men Back In: Sex Differentiation and the Devaluation of Women’s Work, in M. S. Kimmel (ed.), The Gendered Society Reader, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 257–270.

Reskin, B. & Padavic, I. (1994). Women and Men at Work (Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks, CA). Ridgeway, C. L.: 1997, ‘Interaction and the Conservation of Gender Inequality: Considering Employment’, American Sociological Review, 62, 218–235.

Rotundo, M., Nguyen, D. H., & Sackett, P. R. (2001). A Meta-analytic Review of Gender Differences in Perceptions of Sexual Harassment, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 914–922.

Sanchez, J. I. & Brock, P. (1996). Outcomes of Perceived Discrimination among Hispanic Employees: Is Diversity Management a Luxury or a Necessity?, Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 704–719.

Schminke, M., (2001). Considering the Business in Business Ethics: An Exploratory Study of the Influence of Organizational Size and Structure on Individual Ethical Predispositions, Journal of Business Ethics, 30(4), 375–390.

Shah, P. P., (1998). Who are Employees’ Social Referents? Using a Network Perspective to Determine Referent Others, Academy of Management Journal, 41(3), 249–269.

Smith, A. & Rogers. V. (2000). Ethics-related Responses to Specific Situation Vignettes: Evidence of Gender-based Differences and Occupational Socialization, Journal of Business Ethics, 28(1), 73–86.

Tharenou, P. (2002). Gender Differences in Explanations for Relocating or Changing Organizations for Advancement, in R. J. Burke and D. L. Nelson (eds.), Advancing Women’s Careers, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, U.K.

Wharton, A. S. (1992). The Social Construction of Gender and Race in Organizations: A Social Identity and Group Mobilization Perspective, in P. T. Tolbert and S. B. Bacharach (eds.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 10, 55-84.

Williams, C. L. (1992). The Glass Escalator: Hidden Advantages for Men in the “Female” Professions, Social Problems 39,253–267.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22555/pbr.v17i2.114


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.