RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BILINGUAL INSTRUCTION AND LEARNERS’ PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH AS SECOND LANGUAGE CONTEXT

Huma Imran Khan

Abstract


The prime purpose of this study was to explore a correlation
between bilingual instruction in an ESL class and the class
performance of the ESL learners at the secondary level. Quantitative
research method was used to evaluate the test performance of 60 ESL
learners divided into two groups: One was the controlled group (which
was given instructions in L2 only) and the other was the treatment
group (which was given instructions in both L1 and L2) in Public
School settings. Apart from the students, 15 language teachers’ feedback
upon their perceptions of L1 usage in L2 classrooms was taken
by using the Likert scale feedback forms. The results confirmed that
the instructions given bilingually are directly associated to improved
learner outcomes and teachers’ responses for the usage of L1 in
classrooms showed a strong positive response.

Keywords


bilingual instructions, learner performance, mixed coding, second language

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abbas, S. (1993). The power of English in Pakistan. World Englishes, 12(2), 147-156.

Auerbach, E. R. (1993). Reexamining English only in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 27 (1), 9-32.

Aveni, V. A. P. (2005). Study abroad and second language use: Constructing the self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Butzkamm, W. (1998). Code-switching in a bilingual history lesson: The mother tongue as a conversational lubricant. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1(2), 81-99.

Chamot, A. U., & O’malley, J. M. (1987). The cognitive academic language learning approach: A bridge to the main stream. TESOL Quarterly, 21(2), 227-249.

Cook, V. (2001). Using the first language in the classroom. Canadian Modern Language, 57(3), 402-423.

Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 113-143.

Cummins, J. (2007). Rethinking monolingual instructional strategies in multilingual classrooms. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 221-240.

Harmer, J. (2006). How to teach English. New Delhi: Pearson Education. Johnson, R. K., & Swain, M. (Eds.). (1997). Immersion education: International perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

Jütting, J. P., A. Luci and C. Morrison (2010), “Why Do so many Women End up in Bad Jobs? A Cross-country Assessment”, OECD Development Centre Working Papers, No. 287, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kmlhlrz6br0-en

Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Oxford: Pergamon.

Levine, G. (2003). Student and instructor beliefs and attitudes about target language use, first language use, and anxiety: Report of a questionnaire study. Modern Language Journal, 87(3), 343–364.

Littlewood, W., & Yu, B. (2011). First language and target language in the foreign language classroom. Language Teaching, 44(1), 64-77.

Lotherington, H. (2012). Pedagogy of multi-literacies: Rewriting Goldilocks. New York: Routledge.

Macaro, E. (2001). Analyzing student teachers’ code switching in foreign language classrooms: Theories and decision making. The Modern Language Journal, 85(4), 531-548.

Mitchell, R. (1988). Communicative language teaching in practice. London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research.

Mpras, F. (2003). First language use in the classroom: A qualitative study of secondary teachers and administrators in a best case school. Doctoral Dissertation, George Mason University.

Norton, B. (1997). Language, identity, and the ownership of English. TESOL Quarterly, 31(3), 409-429.

Polio, C., & Duff, P. (1994). Teachers’ language use in university foreign language classrooms: A qualitative analysis of English and target language alternation. Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 313–326.

Quirk, R. (1990). Language varieties and standard. English Today, 6(1), 3-10.

Rahman, T. (2001). Language-learning and power: A theoretical approach. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 152, 53-74.

Schweers, C. W. (1999). Using L1 in the L2 classroom. English Teaching Forum, 37(2), 6-9.

Schiffman, H. F. (2003). Tongue-tied in Singapore: A language policy for Tamil? Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 2(2), 105-125.

Sikandar, A., & Hussain, N. (2014). Language ideologies in a business institute: A case study of linguistic and socio-cultural realities. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 1(2), 116-133.

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2005). The evolving sociopolitical context of immersion education in Canada: Some implications for program development1. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 169-186.

Tang, J. (2002, January). Using L1 in the English classroom. English Teaching Forum, 40(1), 36-43.

Tsui, A. (1996). Reticence and anxiety in second language learning. In K. Bailey (Eds.), Voices from the Language Classroom: Qualitative research in secondly language (pp. 145-167). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Walqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(2), 159-180.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v2i1.47

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License