Personality and Ability Traits of Teachers: Student Perceptions

Fareeda Ibad

Abstract


The study attempts to explore higher education students’ perceptions of proficient teachers, which is of importance to them in their learning. Since no effective system of teacher evaluation was in place in Pakistan until recently to distinguish between good and poor teachers, research shows that poor teaching quality is pervasive in higher education institutions in the country. The study analyzed students’ views of good and poor teaching through two focus group discussions with students from two engineering schools in Pakistan. The hematic coding of data yielded the desired outcomes of students’ views according to the personality and ability traits their teachers demonstrated. It was revealed that teachers possessed both categories of characteristics to a certain extent with the shortcomings of approachability, ability to bring knowledge to the level of the students, low emotional intelligence and poor communication ability resulting there from. It is expected that action to improve teaching quality would result in awareness of the problem. 

Keywords: behavioral theory, cognitive theory, effective teaching, personality
characteristics, teacher behavior


Keywords


effective teaching; personality characteristics; ability features; constructs; behavioral theory; cognitive theory

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, L.W. (2004). Increasing teacher effectiveness. 2nd edition. Paris: IIEP-UNESCO http:www.unesco.org.iiep

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.

Beishuzen, J. J., Hof, E., van Putten, C.M., Bouwmeester, S., & Asscher, J.J. (2001). Students’ and teachers’ cognitions about good teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(2), 185-201.

Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices. Textbooks Collection, Book 3.

Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2005): The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Fernstermacher, G.D., & Richardson, V. (2005). On making determinations of quality in teaching. Teachers College Record, 107(1), 186-213.

Freitas, H., Oliveira, M., Jenkins, M., & Popjoy, O. (1998). The focus group, a qualitative research method. ISRC, working paper. Merrick School of Business, University of Baltimore.

Fuhrmann, B.S., & Grasha, A.F. (1983). A practical handbook for college teachers. Boston: Little Brown.

Goleman, D. (2002). The new leaders: Emotional intelligence at work. London: Time Warner Books.

Harvey, L. (2011). The nexus of feedback and improvement.In C.S. Nair and P. Mertova (Eds.). Student feedback: The cornerstone to an effective quality assurance system in higher education. (pp.3-26).Oxford UK: Chandos Publishing.

Hay McBer. (2000). Research into teacher effectiveness: A model of teacher effectiveness. Report to the Department of Education and Employment June 2000. London: DfEE.

Ibad, F. (2016). Student perceptions about the professional competence of university faculty members: Evidence from Pakistan. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 4, 201-207.

Ibad, F., & Sharjeel, M. Y. (2017). Teacher effectiveness as perceived by students in higher education. Journal of Education & Humanities Research, 3(1), 110 -132.

Leinhardt, G. (1988). Situated knowledge and expertise in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.) Teachers’ professional learning. London: Falmer Press. 146-168.

Lowyck, J. (1994). Teaching effectiveness: An overview of studies. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijs Research, 19(1), 17-25.

Marsh H.W. (1982). SEEQ: A reliable, valid and useful instrument for collecting students’ evaluations of university teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 52, 77 – 95

Marsh, H.W. (1983). Multidimensional ratings of teaching effectiveness by students from different academic settings and their relation to student/course/instructor characteristics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75. 150-166.

Marsh, H.W., & Dunkin, M.J. (1992). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In J.C. Smart (Ed.) Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, 8. New York: Agathon Press.

Raymond, S.M. (2008): Effective and ineffective university teaching from the students’ and faculty’s perspective: Matched or mismatched expectations. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). University of Exeter, U.K.

Riassati, M. J., & Bagheri, M.S. (2014). Students’ perceptions of effective teaching: A review of literature. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 6(3), 420-428.

Rogers. C.R., & Frieberg, H.J. (1969). Freedom to learn. Prentice Hall.

Shulman, L.S. (2004). Essays on teaching, learning and learning to teach. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Skinner, B.F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Prentice Hall.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.

Walsh, D.J., Maffei, M.J. (1994). Never in a class by themselves: An examination of behaviors affecting the student-professor relationship. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 5 (2), 23-49.

Yodez, D.S., Shaw, L., Sixakwazi, B., & Kaarina, Y. (1993). Elements of “good teaching”: A comparison of educational students’ perceptions in Botswana, California, Finland and Zimbabwe. A paper presented to the Annual Conference of the Comparative and International Education Society. Annapolis Maryland. March 1992, 13-15.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v5i2.2215

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License