Activity-Based Teaching, Student Motivation and Academic Achievement

FIZZA ANWAR

Abstract


This research was conducted to determine the effects of activity-based teaching on student motivation and academic achievement. Pretest and post-test control group design of experimental research was employed for this study. Two MCQ achievement tests were used as research tools for the data collection as pre-test and post-test. The first step in this project was to gather information about what motivates students to learn. Pre-test was conducted from both groups and results were tabulated. The second step of the project was to examine the effect of hands-on activities on student motivation and for analysis MCQ achievement test was used along with specially designed work sheets from both groups. T-test was used to analyze the data. The results of this study showed that a majority of students’ scores increased in experimental group as compared to the control group. The mean value indicated that participants from experimental group showed more achievement in post-test 15.6, while the control group students scored 10.7. The post-lesson survey showed that the majority students found the activity based teaching to be more interesting than lecture based teaching.


Keywords: activity based learning, student motivation, constructivist approach, students’ achievement.


Keywords


activity based learning, student motivation, constructivist approach, students’ achievement.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderman, E. M., & Young, A. J. (1994). Motivation and strategy use in science: Individual differences and classroom effects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(8), 811-831.

Boud, D., & Feletti, G., Eds. (1991). The challenge of problem-based learning. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Chafe, A. (1998). Cooperative Learning and the Second Language Classroom. Retrieved from http://www.stemnet.nf.ca/~achafe/cooplang.html

Churchill, D. (2003), Effective design principles for activity-based learning: The crucial role of ‘learning objects’ in science and engineering education. Paper Presented at the Ngee Ann Polytechnic, 2.

Dean, C. D. (1999). Problem-Based Learning in Teacher Education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, April 19–23, Montreal, Quebec (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 431 771).

Ericksen, S. C. (1978). The Lecture. Memo to the Faculty, 60. Ann Arbor: Center for Research on Teaching and Learning, University of Michigan.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Freedman, M. P. (1997). Relationship among laboratory instruction, attitude toward science, and achievement in science knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(4), 343-357.

Gallagher, S. A., & Stepien, W. J. (1996). Content acquisition in problem-based learning: Depth versus breadth in American studies. Talents and Gifts, 19(3), 257-275.

Harfield, T., Davies, K., Hede, J., Panko, M., & Kenley, R. (2007). Activity-based teaching for Unitec New Zealand construction students. Emirates Journal for Engineering Research, 12(1), 57-63.

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74.

Duch, B. J., Groh, S. E., & Allen, D. E. (2001). The power of problem-based learning: A practical how to for teaching undergraduate courses in any discipline. Virginia: Stylus Publishing, LLC.

Martin, K. J., Chrispeels, J. H., & D’Emidio-Caston, M. (1998). Exploring the use of problem-based learning for developing collaborative leadership skills. Journal of School Leadership 8, 470-500.

Panko, M., Kenley, R., Davies, K., Piggot-Irvine, E., Allen, B., Hede, J. & Harfield, T. (2005). Learning styles of those in the building and construction sector. Report for Building Research, New Zealand.

Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667.

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231. Retrieved from http://ctlt.jhsph.edu/ resources/views/content/files/150/Does_Active_Learning_Work.pdf

Schmidt, H. G. (1983). Problem-based learning: rationale and description. Medical Education, 17(1), 11-16. Retrieved from http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/2745/eur_ schmidt_143.pdf 03 Jan, 2012.

Schmidt, H. G., & Van Der Molen, H. T. (2001). Self-reported competency ratings of graduates of a problem-based medical curriculum. Academic Medicine, 76(5), 466-468.

Schmidt, H. G., Vermeulen, L., & Van Der Molen, H. T. (2006). Longterm effects of problem-based learning: A comparison of competencies acquired by graduates of a problem-based and a conventional medical school. Medical Education, 40(6), 562-567.

Schlechty, P. (1994). Increasing student engagement. Columbia: Missouri Leadership Academy.

Spitzer, D. R. (1996). Motivation: The neglected factor in instructional design. Educational Technology, 36(3), 45-49.

Teo, R., & Wong, A. (2000). Does problem based learning create a better student: A reflection. 2nd Asia Pacific Conference on Problem–Based Learning: Education Across Disciplines (pp. 4-7).

Zumbach, J., Kumpf, D. & Koch, S. (2004). Using multimedia to enhance problem-based Learning in elementary school. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 2004(1), 25-37.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v6i1.1782

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License