Student Optimism – Grading of an Experiential Learning Project

Nawaz Ahmad, Sarwat Nauman

Abstract


In order to obtain good grades, students involve themselves in hard work according to the best of their ability, yet an experiential learning project makes it even harder to attain the grades that the students are aiming for. Researches have shown that students are generally optimistic about their grades, yet no research has been conducted in Pakistan to gauge student optimism in grades with regard to experiential learning projects. This study is an attempt to gauge an empirical attempt to gauge students’ optimism towards their grades in an experiential learning project. A sample of 106 students is obtained via purposive sampling technique enrolled in the same university and same course. After being involved in an experiential learning project, they were asked their expected marks which were compared later with their actually obtained marks. Pair sample t-test is applied to figure out whether the average of perceived marks is statistically different than the average of actually obtained marks. The average of expected marks exceeds by 2.14 which is statistically significant at 99.9% confidence interval.


Keywords


experiential learning, students’ expectations, pair sample t-test

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bandura, A. (1997) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.

Bell, B. S., & Federman, J. E. (2010). Self-assessments of knowledge: Where do we go from here? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(2), 342-347.

Bengtsson, C., Persson, M., & Willenhag, P. (2005). Gender and overconfidence. Economics Letters, 86(2), 199-203.

Beyer, S. (1999). Gender differences in the accuracy of grade expectancies and evaluations. Sex Roles, 41(3-4), 279-296.

Bressler, L. A., Bressler, M. E., & Bressler, M. S. (2010). The role and relationship of hope, optimism and goal setting in achieving academic success: A study of students enrolled in online accounting courses. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal,14(4), 37-51.

Cano, J. L., Lidon, I., Rebollar, R., Roman, P., & Saenz, M. J. (2006). Student groups solving real-life projects. A case study of experiential learning.International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(6), 1252-1260

Carpenter, V., Friar, S., & Lipe, M. (1994). Evidence on the performance of accounting students: Race, gender, and expectations. Issues in Accounting Education, 8(1), 1–17.

Centra, J. A. (2003). Will Teachers receive higher student evaluations by giving higher grades and less course work? Research in Higher Education, 44(5), 495-518.

Chana, C. K. (2012). Exploring an experiential learning project through Kolb's Learning Theory using a qualitative research method. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37(4), 405-415.

Delaney, L., Harmon, C., & Redmond, C. (2011). Parental education, grade attainment and earnings expectations among university students. IZA DP No. 5646, 1-44.

Felton, J., Gibson, B., & Sanbonmatsu, D. M. (2003). Preference for risk in investing as a function of trait optimism and gender. The journal of behavioral finance, 4(1), 33-40.

Fenollar, P., Roman, S., & Cuestas, P. J. (2007). University students’ academic performance: An integrative conceptual framework and empirical analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology (2007), 77, 873–891.

Guillaumea, D. W., & Khachikianb, C. S. (2011). The effect of time‐on‐task on student grades and grade expectations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(3), 251-261.

Heikkilä, A., & Lonka, K. (2006). Studying in higher education: Students’ approaches to learning, self-regulation, and cognitive strategies. Studies in Higher Education 31(1), 99–117.

Jama, I., & Pitts, V. R. (2005). High expectations: A "How" of achieving equitable mathematics classrooms. Negro Educational Review, 56(2), 127-134.

Khachikiana, C. S., Guillaumea, D. W., & Phama, T. K. (2011). Changes in student effort and grade expectation in the course of a term. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(6), 595-605.

Lammers, H. B., Kiesler, T., Curren, M. T., Cours, D., & Connett, B. (2005). How hard do I have to work? Student and faculty expectations regarding university work. Journal of Education for Business, 80(4), 210-213.

Larseingue, M., Sawyer, C. R., & Finn, A. N. (2012). Components of students' grade expectation for public speaking assignment. Communication Education, 61(4), 428-447.

Patton, W., Bartrum, D. A., & Creed, P. A. (2004). Gender differences for optimism, self-esteem, expectations and goals in predicting career planning and exploration in adolescents. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 4(2-3), 193-209.

Pew, S. (2007). Andragogy and pedagogy as foundational theory for student motivation in higher education. Insight: A Collection of Faculty Scholarship, 2, 14-25.

Phipps, M., Phipps, C., Kask, S., & Higgins, S. (2001). University students' perceptions of cooperative learning: Implications for administrators and instructors. The Journal of Experiential Education, 24(1), 14-21.

Rand, K. L. (2009). Hope and optimism: Latent structures and influences on grade expectancy and academic performance. Journal of Personality, 77(1), 231-260.

Roosevelt, M. (2009). Student expectations seen as causing grade disputes. New York Times, L2.

Sitzmann, T., Ely, K., Brown, K. G., & Bauer, K. N. ( 2010). Self-Assessment of knowledge: A cognitive learning or effective measure? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(2), 169 –191.

Stoecker, J. (1999). Optimism and grade expectancies. Psychological Reports, 83(3), 873-879.

White, C. B. (2007). Smoothing out transitions: How pedagogy influences medical students’ achievement of self-regulated learning goals. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 12(3), 279–297.

Zangenehzadeh, H. (1988). Grade inflation: A way out. The Journal of Economic Education, 19(3), 217-226.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v7i1.1476

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License