Performing Below the Targeted Level: An Investigation into KS3 Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Mathematics

Anusha Mirza, Nasreen Hussain

Abstract


This study sets out to investigate the attitude KS3 pupils have towards mathematics and the factors that influence this attitude. A case study approach was used as the pupils were a unit of the school under study and a survey method was chosen to provide scope to the study.  Purposeful sampling was employed for the selection of 200 pupils from years 7 and 9 who were from target achiever and non target achiever groups.  Attitudes Toward Mathematics Inventory (Tapia, 1996) was administered to the participants to measure their attitude towards mathematics. Data were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17.  The result for the first hypothesis indicated that there is a significant difference on the variable of mathematics attitude of year 7 and 9 target achievers and non target achievers pupils (t=4.11, df =199, p <.05) and for the second hypothesis, the difference in the variety of attitudes is statistically significant in the pupuls from both groups (t=2.3, df =210, p <.05). The results of the research will enable teachers to understand the factors that effect attitude of pupils towards mathematics at secondary level and direct head teachers to establish effective teacher training and support system to help pupils to develop an interest in mathematics.


Keywords


mathematics attitudes; secondary level; target achievers; under achievers

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ai, X. (2002). Gender differences in growth in mathematics achievement: Three-level longitudinal and multilevel analyses of individual, home, and school influences. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(1), 1–22.

Ajzen, I. (1989). Attitude structure and behaviour. In A. R. Pratkanis & S. J. Breckler (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 241-274). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaun.

Albarracin, D., Zanna, M., Johnson, B., & Kumkale, G. (2005). Attitudes: Introduction and scope. In D. B. Albaracin, M. Johnson & M. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 3-20). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Allport, G. (1935). Attitudes. In C. Murchison (Ed.). The handbook of social psychology (vol. 2) (pp. 798-844). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.

Ampadu, E. (January 2013). Aspiring mathematicians: Students’ views regarding what it takes to be successful in mathematics. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Retrieved from http://www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/journal/ampadu.pdf

Baroody, A. J. (1987). Children’s mathematical thinking: Developmental framework for preschool, primary, and special education teachers. New York: Teachers College Press.

Berger, M. (2000). Pupils’ beliefs in Vienna and lower Austria. In S.Gotz & G.Torner (Eds.), Research on mathematical beliefs (pp.1-8). Proceedings of the MAVI-9 Eurpoean Workshop Vienna.

Bishop, A. J. (1996). International handbook of mathematics education. New York:Springer.

Blum, M. K. (2002). Enhancement of students learning and attitudes towards mathematics through authentic learning experiences. Unpublished Dissertation, Curtin University of Technology, Australia.

Bonner, E. P. (2014). Investigating practices of highly successful mathematics teachers of traditionally underserved students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(3). 377-399.

Chamberlain, S. (2010). A review of Instruments created to assess affect in mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(1), 167-182.

Cline, G. D. (2005). Parents’ representations of their children’s mathematics learning in multiethnic primary schools. British Educational Research Journal, 31(6), 697-722.

Cockcroft, W. H. (1982). Mathematics counts: Report of the commission of inquiry into the teaching of mathematics in schools. London: Her Majesty’s Office.

Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Peterson, P. L., & Carsey, D. A. (1988). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of pupils’ problem solving in elementary arithmetic. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(5), 385-401.

Furner, J. M., Yahya, N., & Duffy, M. L. (2005). Teach mathematics: Strategies to reach out to all pupils. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41, 16-24.

Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Chicago Aldine Press.

Goos, M., Galbraith, P., Renshaw, P., & Geiger, V. (2003). Perspectives on technology mediated learning in secondary school mathematics classrooms. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(1), 73-89.

Hemmings, B., Grootenboer, P., & Kay, R (2011). Predicting mathematics achievement: The influence of prior achievement and attitudes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 691-705.

Hoyle, C., Harris, M. J., & Judd, C. M. (2002). Research methods in social relations (7thed.). Fort Worth, TX: Wadsworth.

Kadijevich, D. (2008). TIMSS 2003: Relating dinmensions of mathematics attitude to mathematics achievement. Retrieved from http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0579-6431/2008/0579-64310802327K.pdf . DOI:10.2298/ZIPI0802327K

Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn maths. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Kishore, N., & Ma, X. (1997). Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(1), 26-47.

Kislenko, K., Barbro, G., & Lepik, M. (2007). Mathematics is important but boring: Students’ beliefs and attitudes towards mathematics. In C. Bergsten, B. Grevholm, H. S. Masoval, and F. Ronning (Eds), Relating practice and research in mathematics education. Proceedings of NORMA 05 (pp.349-360). Trondheim, Norway: Tapir Academic Press.

Klein, M. (2004). The premise and promise of inquiry based mathematics in pre service teacher education: A poststructuralist analysis. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 32(1), 35-47.

Lee, C. (2006). Language for learning mathematics: Assessment for learning in practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Lee. C. S., & Wilder, S. J. (2013). Learning mathematics-letting the pupils have their say. Educ Stud Math, 83, 163-180. DOI: 10.1007/s10649-012-9445-3

Maughan, S., & Cooper, L. (2010). Policy and developments in mathematics assessment in England. Paper presented at the 36th International Association for Educational Assessment Conference: Assessment for future generations. Bangkok.

McLeod, D. (1989). Beliefs, Attitudes and emotions: New views of affect in mathematics. In D. McLeod, & V. M. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective (pp. 245-258). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Newbill, P. L. (2005). Instructional strategies to improve women’s attitudes towards science. PhD Thesis.Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA.

Nicol, C., & Crespo, S. (2005). Exploring mathematics in imaginative places: Rethinking what counts as meaningful contexts for learning mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 105(5), 240–251. DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18164.

Orton, D., Orton, A., & Frobisher, L. J. (2004). Insights into teaching mathematics. New York: Continuum.

Philippou, G., & Christou, C. (1998). The developmental nature of ability to solve onestep word problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(4), 436-442.

PISA. (2003). Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/school/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/34002216.pdf

Quinn, R. J. (1997). Effects of mathematics methods courses on the mathematical attitudes and content knowledge of pre-service teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 91(2), 108-114. DOI: 10.1080/00220679709597528

Reinup, R. (2009). Developing of mathematics teachers’ community: Five groups, five different ways. Cerme 6–Working Group, 10, 18-31.

Samuelsson, J. (2010). The impact of teaching approaches on pupils’ mathematical proficiency in Sweden. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(2), 61-78.

Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest and academic engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323–332.

Swanson, H. L. (2006). Cognitive processes that underlie mathematical pre cociousness in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93, 239-264.

Tapia, M. (1996). The attitudes toward mathematics instrument. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Tuscaloosa, AL (ERIC Reproduction Service No. ED 404165).

Tapia, M., & Marsh, G.E. II. (2000). Attitudes toward mathematics instrument: An investigation with middle school pupils. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-south Educational Research Association, Bowling Green, KY (ERIC Reproduction Service No. ED 449045).

Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp.334-369). New York: Macmillan.

Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation: Metaphors, theories and research. Newbury Park, California: Sage.

Westwood, P. (2008). What teachers need to know about teaching methods.Victoria: ACER Press. Retrieved from http://elibrary.kiu.ac.ug:8080/jspui/bitstream/1/1481/1/What%20teachers%20need%20to%20know%20about%20teaching%20methods%20by%20Peter%20westwood.pdf

Whyte, J. M. (2009). Maths anxiety: The what, where and how. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Massey University, USA.

Whyte, J., & Anthony, G. (2012). Maths anxiety: The fear factor in the mathematics classroom. New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work, 9(1), 6-15.

Wood, L. N. (2012). Practice and conceptions: Communicating mathematics in the workplace. Educ Stud Math, 79, 109–125. DOI 10.1007/s10649-011-9340-3

Woodbury, S. (October 1998). Rhetoric, reality, and possibilities: Interdisciplinary teaching and secondary mathematics. School Science and Mathematics Association, 98(6), 34-40.

Yeo, K. K. (2009). Secondary 2 pupils’ difficulties in solving non-routine problems. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 8(1), 1-30. Retrieved from: http://www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/journal/yeo.pdf




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v5i1.1390

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License