Motivating Learning in Mathematics Through Collaborative Problem Solving: A Focus on Using Rich Tasks

Nasreen Hussain, Anusha Mirza

Abstract


This paper is based on the concept that lively and interactive math classes are possible by incorporating rich tasks to meet the needs of students operating at different levels in the classrooms. A study was carried out to find out the impact on learning and motivation of using rich tasks at secondary level in the maths class by incorporating co-operative learning. Qualitative research paradigm was opted for the study using an action research approach and the data were collected through two semi-structured interviews conducted at the onset of the research and after the intervention.  Few important findings indicate that rich tasks demand different levels of challenge and extend opportunities to those students who need them.

Keywords


Rich tasks; Collaborative learning; Cooperative learning; Maths

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bennett, N. (1991). Co-operative learning in classroom processes and outcomes.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry Review, 3(4), 146-55.

Biott, C., & Eason, P. (1994).Collaborative learning in staffrooms and classrooms. London: David Fulton Publishers Ltd.

Brown, A., & Dowling, P. (1998).Doing research/reading research: A mode of interrogation for education. London: Falmer Press.

Cellis, W. (1993). New teaching method puts math in real life. New York Times May 27, 2008

Cockcroft, W.H. (1982). Mathematics Counts, London: HMSO.

Collay, M., & Gagnon, G (nd). Constructivist learning design..Retrieved from www.painbrow.com

Flewelling, G. (n.d.). Rich learning tasks: Changing the culture of the mathematics classroom. Retrieved from : unipa.it/~grim/AFlewelling

Friere (2001). New Basics: The why, what, how and when of rich tasks. Retrieved from http://www.education.qld.gov.au/corporate/newbasi

Gillies, R. (2007). cooperative learning: integrating theory and practice. Califonia: Sage Publications.

Ginnis, P., & Brandes, D. (1996). A guide to student-centred learning. Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes Ltd.

Graham,T., Sharp.J., & Maull, M. (1999). Bridge building: A practical mathematics task. Retrieved from The Mathematical Association Website http://www.m a.org.uk/docs/library/2071.pdf

Guskey, T. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching:Theory and Perspectives, 8, 381-391.

Hanco, G. (1999). Increasing competence through collaborative problem-solving. London: David Fulton Publishers.

HMI. (1985). Mathematics from 5 to 16, London: HMSO.

Herbert, M. (1990). Planning a research project: A guide for practitioners and trainees in the helping professions. London; Cassel Publishers.

Jones, S., & Tanner, H. (2000).Becoming a successful teacher of mathematics. London: Routledge Falmer.

Jonassen, D. (1994, April). Thinking technology. Educational Technology, 34 (4), 34-37.

Mathematics at Key Stage 4: Developing a scheme of work, the Secondary National Strategy (2007). Secondary National Strategy, DFES.

Millis, B., & Cottell, P. (1998). Assigning group roles. American Council on Education Series on Higher Education: Oryx Press.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.(1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

O’Brien, M. (2005).Co-operative learning in the maths classroom. Retrieved from http://www.otrnet.com.au/Presentations/presentations.html

Piggott, J. (2007). Rich tasks and contexts. Retrieved from www.nrich.maths.org

Queensland curriculum, assessment and reporting framework (2003). Queensland University of Technology. Australia.

Resek, D. Kysh, J., & Hsu, E. (nd). Using rich problems for differentiated instruction. Retrieved, from http://math.sfsu.edu/hsu/papers/HsuKyshResekRich Problems.pdf

Rogers, C. (1965). Client-centred therapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.

Sandra, C., & Cynthia, N. (2005). Exploring mathematics in imaginative places: Rethinking what counts as meaningful contexts for learning mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 105(5).

Selinger, M. (2006).Teaching mathematics. New York: Routledge.

Sidhu, K.S. (2000). Methodology of research in education. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers.

Sullivan, P., Mousley, J., & Zevenbergen, R. (2006). Teacher actions to maximize mathematics learning opportunities in heterogeneous classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4, 117-143.

Warfield, J., Wood, T., Lehman, J. (2005). Atutonomy beliefs and learning of elementary mathematics teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 439-456.

Yeo, B. W. (2007). Mathematical tasks: Clarification, classification and choice of suitable tasks for different types of learning and assessment. Mathematics and Mathematics Education . National Institution of Education, Technical Report Me 2007-01.

Zevenbergen, R., Sullivan, O., & Mousley, J. (2003).The contexts of mathematics tasks and the context of the classroom: Are we including all students? Mathematics Enhancement Research Journal, 15 (2), 107-121.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v1i1.13

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License