Importance of Intrinsic and Instrumental Value of Education in Pakistan

Mahendar Kumar

Abstract


Normally, effectiveness of any object or thing is judged by two values; intrinsic and instrumental. To compare intrinsic value of education with instrumental value, this study has used the following variables: getting knowledge for its own sake, getting knowledge for social status, getting knowledge for job or business endeavor and getting knowledge for both purposes, which is for its own sake and also for job, business or status. For this research quantitative method was used and a questionnaire was deployed to collect responses from 465 bachelor degree students from all over Pakistan (combining all provinces including Gilgit & AJK). It was found that the students gave mixed responses of acknowledging both values of education during the survey. The research has significant relationship between each of its independent and dependent variables, although the strength of those relationships was weak in nature. However, 60% of the respondents when asked whether they will get their first or bachelor’s degree even if there is no instrumental value attached with it, responded in affirmative. This concludes that bachelor degree students in Pakistan give more value to intrinsic nature of education than its instrumental value.


Keywords


bachelor’s degree, intrinsic value, instrumental value, value of education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baum, S., & Payea, K. (2005). The benefits of higher education for individuals and society. Trends in higher education. New York: College Board.

Chinnathambi, V., Rajasekar, S., & Philominathan, K. (2013). Research methodology. Tamilanda: Diva Publications.

Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1980). Research methods in education. London: Croom Helm Ltd.

Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Thousand Oakes: Sage Publication.

Cronon, W. (1998). Only Connect. The goals of the liberal education. American Scholar. 67(4)

Das, S. (2013). Education and social mobility: A textual analysis in Indian perspective. Educationia Confab, 2(1), 2-9.

Decj, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New Jersey: Springer.

Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 325-346.

Dorsey, D. (2009). What is instrumental value? Department of Philosophy, University of Kansas. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c3f0/09dc9e208fcf0d9e4782c8797f11424c1747.pdf

Frick T. (2004). Types of knowledge of education created through disciplined inquiry. Instructional Systems Technology Department, School of Education. Indiana University, Bloomington.

Holton, E. F., & Burnett, M. F. (2005). The basics of quantitative research. In R.A. Swanson & E.F. Holton (Eds.), Research in organizations: Foundations and methods of inquiry (pp. 115- 141). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

Hummel C. (1999). “Aristotle”, PROSPECTS. The quarterly review of comparative education UNESCO: International Bureau of Education, 23(1/2), p. 39-51.

Justus, J., Colyvan, M., Regan, H., & Maguire, L. (2009). Buying into conservation: intrinsic versus instrumental value. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(4), 187-191.

Kant, I., & M. Gregor, C. M. K. (1785). Kant: Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. Cambridge texts in the history of philosophy.

Korsgaard, C. M. (1983). Two distinctions in goodness. The Philosophical Review, 92(2), 169-195.

Korsgaard, C. M. (1986). Aristotle and Kant on the source of value. Ethics, 96(3), 486-505.

Langford, G., & O’Connor, D. J. (Eds.) (2010). New essays in the philosophy of education. International Library of the Philosophy of Education 13. Routledge.

Mackie, J. L. (1977). Ethics: Inventing right and wrong. New York: Penguin.

Moore, G. E. (1903). 1993. Principia ethica. Retrieved from http://fairuse.org/g-e-moore/principia-ethica

Moore, G. E. (1922). The conception of intrinsic value. Philosophical studies, 260.

Nazimuddin, S. K. (2014). Social mobility and role of education in promoting social mobility. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Research, 1-4.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v4i2.1024

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License