The Experimental Study On the Effectiveness of Social Media Ad Campaign: Like, Comment, Share

Sania Usmani, Syed Fawaz Ali, Kiran Imtiaz, Hamza Ghani Khan


The popularity of social media outlets has forced us to inquire about marketing effectiveness in any area of the industry. Social media has rapidly risen in popularity as a new advertising platform that allows users to connect with one another and engage with brands.  This research has attempted to explore the attitude of people over the advertisements in what formats most people prefer to like, comment or share. We focus top trended social media sites Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn to demonstrate the consumer engagement on advertisements placed on these sites. This research has identified the factors which influence the users to keep an eye out on advertisements that make them want to continue watching it as they spend their daily time on these social media websites and apps. To determine what makes Ads and online marketing campaigns successful we used variables such as Vividness, Content of Posts, Position of Posts, Scheduling and Call to Action.  It was conducted on 300 respondents. We used the questionnaire to collect the data and used a semantic differential scale. We questioned about the ads to respondents which were based on our variables. Results showed that our research is decisive but the variable call to action has an insignificant effect and other variables such as vividness, the position of post, the content of the post, schedule have a significant relation with customer engagement.


Social Media, Engagement, Vividness, Call to action, Scheduling, Content, Position of post

Full Text:



Abramovich, Giselle (2013, August 21), Three Lessons From MasterCard’s 'Priceless' Campaign, Retrieved August 21, 2013, from j0s

Briggs, R. and Hollis, N. (1997), “Advertising on the web: is there response before clickthrough?”,

Burns, K.S. and Lutz, R.J. (2006), “The function of format: consumer responses to six online advertising formats”, Journal of Advertising, 35(1), 53-63.

Brodie, R. J., Ilic, A., Juric, B., & Hollebeek, L. (2013). Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis. Journal of business research, 66(1), 105-114.

Chi, H. (2011), “Interactive digital advertising vs virtual brand community: exploratory study of user motivation and social media marketing responses in Taiwan”, Journal of Interactive Advertising, 12(1), 44-61.

Chua, A. Y. K., & Banerjee, S. (2015). Marketing via Social Networking Sites: A study of brand-post popularity for brands in Singapore.

Coyle, J.R. and Thorson, E. (2001). The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in web marketing sites. Journal of Advertising, 30(3), 65-77.

De Vries, L., Gensler, S. and Leeflang, P.S. (2012). Popularity of brand posts on brand fan pages: an investigation of the effects of social media marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(2), 83-91.

Drèze, X., & Hussherr, F. X. (2003). Internet advertising: Is anybody watching?. Journal of interactive marketing, 17(4), 8-23.

Durvasula, S., Lysonski, S. and Watson, J. (2001), “Does vanity describe other cultures? A cross-cultural examination of the vanity scale”, Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 180-199.

Firat, F.A. and Dholakia, N. (2006), “Theoretical and philosophical implications of postmodern debates: some challenges to modern marketing”, Marketing Theory, 6(2), 123-62.

Fortin, D.R. and Dholakia, R.R. (2005). Interactivity and vividness effects on social presence and involvement with a web-based advertisement. Journal of Business Research, 58(3), 387-396.

Karson, E.J., McCloy, S.D. and Bonner, P.G. (2006), “An examination of consumers’ attitudes and beliefs towards web site advertising”, Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 28(2), 77-91.

Kim, C., & Yang, S. U. (2017). Like, comment, and share on Facebook: How each behavior differs from the other. Public Relations Review, 43(2), 441-449.

Luarn, P., Lin, Y. F., & Chiu, Y. P. (2015). Influence of Facebook brand-page posts on online engagement. Online Information Review, 39(4), 505-519.

Mishne, G. and Glance, N. (2006). Leave a reply: an analysis of weblog comments, paper presented at the Third Annual Workshop on the Weblogging Ecosystem, May 22-26, Edinburgh.

Mittal, V. and Kamakura, W.A. (2001), “Satisfaction, repurchase intent, and repurchase behavior: investigating the moderating effect of customer characteristics”, Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 131-42.

Muntinga, D. G., Moorman, M., & Smit, E. G. (2011). Introducing COBRAs: Exploring motivations for brand-related social media use. International Journal of advertising, 30(1), 13-46.

Rodger, S. and Thorson, E. (2000), “The interactive advertising model: how users perceive and process online ads”, Journal of Interactive Advertising, 1(1), 41-60.

Sashi, C.M. (2009), “Buyer behavior in business markets: a review and integrative model”,Journal of Global Business Issues, 3(2), 129-38.

Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of communication, 42(4), 73-93.

Tafesse, W. (2015). Content strategies and audience response on Facebook brand pages. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 33(6), 927-943.

Tikkanen, H., Hietanen, J., Henttonen, T. and Rokka, J. (2009), “Exploring virtual worlds:success factors in virtual world marketing”, Management Decision, 47(8), 1357-81

Wirtz, B.W., Schilke, O. and Ullrich, S. (2010), “Strategic development of business models: implications of the Web 2.0 for creating value on the internet”, Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 272-90.

Zhang, K. Z., & Benyoucef, M. (2016). Consumer behavior in social commerce: A literature review. Decision Support Systems, 86, 95-108.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Comments on this article

View all comments

Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Experiential Learning & Case Studies

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.