Applying and Evaluating Teacher Professional Development Models – A Case Study of a Pakistani School

Sarwat Nauman

Abstract


There is recently a shift towards competency-based education in Pakistan, which is the outcome of its National Education Policy. This research investigates the professional development activities that teachers embark on related to this change and in turn the extent to which the in-service teacher development taking place in schools of Pakistan. Through a case study approach, this research will investigate one of the best schools of Karachi in terms of its board results and probe to see how a school system encourages its teachers to develop them professionally. It is concluded that three models of teacher development were being followed unintentionally at the school: Individually-Guided Staff Development model, Observation/Assessment model and the Training Model. The problem was that these models were not followed in their full spirit due to lack of motivation from the administration. Even though school systems are trying to professionally develop their teachers, they lack the competency as to how to conduct a successful teacher development program.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Avalos, B. (2011). Review: Teacher professional development . Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 10-20.

Buehl, M. M., & Beck, J. S. (2015). The relationship between teachers beliefs and teachers practices. In H. Fives, & M. G. Gill, International Handbook of Research on Teachers’ Beliefs (pp. 66-84). New York: Routledge.

Seezink, A., & Poell, R. (2011). The role of schools’ perceived human resource policies in teachers’ professional development activities: a comparative study of innovations toward competence-based education. Asia Pacif ic Education Review, 12(1), 149-160.

Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching. New York: National Commission on Teaching & America's Future.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). How teacher education matter. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 166-173.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Teacher learning that supports student learning. Educational Leadership, 55(5), 91-100.

Day, C. (1999). Developing teachers: The challenges of lifelong learning. London: Falmer Press. Garet, M., Porter, A., Desimone, L., Birman, B., &

Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational

Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.

Harris, D. N., Ingle, W. K., & Rutledge, S. A. ( 2014). How teacher evaluation methods matter for accountability: A comparative analysis of teacher effectiveness ratings by principals and teacher value-added measures. American Educational Research Journal, 51(1) , 73–112.

Hopkins, C., & McKeown, R. (2005). Guidelines and recommendations for reorienting teacher education to address sustainability. Paris: UNESCO.

Hubbard, R., & Power, B. (2006). Researching the Program. In Innovations in teacher education: a social constructivist approach (pp. 131-146). New York: State University of New York Press.

Levin, B. B. (2015 ). The Development of teachers' Beliefs . In H. Fives, & M. G. Gill, International Handbook on Teachers' Beliefs (pp. 48-65). New York: Routledge.

Lieberman, J. M., & Wilkins, E. A. (2006). The professional development pathways models: From policy to practice. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 42(3), 124-128.

Mahmood, K. (2014). Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 8(2), 146-161.

Policy and Planning Wing. (2009). National professional standards for teachers in Pakistan. Islamabad: Ministry of Education.

MCEECDYA. (2011). National Professional Standards for Teachers. Australia: Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership.

Rehmani, A. (2006). Teacher education in Pakistan with particular reference to teachers’ conceptions of teaching. Quality in education: Teaching and leadership in challenging times, 20, 495-524.

Ross, J. A., & Bruce, C. (2007). Teacher Self-Assessment: A Mechanism for Facilitating Professional Growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(2), 146-159.

Rotherham, A. J., & Willingham, D. (2009). 21st Century Skills: The Challenges Ahead. Teaching for the 21st Century, 67(1), 16-21.

Schulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.

Shulman, L. (1992) Toward a pedagogy of cases. In J. Shulman (Ed.), Case method in teacher education (pp. 1-30). New York: Teachers College Press.

Sparks, D., & Loucks-Horsley, S. (1990). Models of staff development. In R. H. (Ed), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (pp. 40-57). New York: Macmillan.

Waqar, Z. (2007). An Action Research at San Francisco State University/San Francisco Head Start: A Continuous, and Effective Improvement Plan for Early Childhood Teachers. In S. Ali, &

M. Rizvi, Quality in education: Teaching and leadership in challenging times. Vol. 2 (pp. 735- 745). Karachi: Aga Khan University, Institute for Educational Development.

Yüce, K., Şahin, E. Y., Koçer, Ö., & Kana, F. (2013). Motivations for choosing teaching as a career: a perspective of pre-service teachers from a Turkish context. Asia Pacific Education Review,

(3), 295-306.

Zhu, X. (2013). Discussion of the reconstruction of rural teacher training configuration in China. In X. Zhu, & K. Zeichner, New frontiers of educational research: Preparing teachers for the

st century (pp. 79-97). New York: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22555/ijelcs.v2i2.1941

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Comments on this article

View all comments


Copyright (c) 2018 International Journal of Experiential Learning & Case Studies

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.